RE: [Catacomb] Proposed Road Map
I think you will find that in order to implement the DeltaV features listed,
you will need to change to a binding-like referential containment model.
Hence, though it may seem a bit backwards, I recommend implementing BIND
before DeltaV core versioning, so the containment model is ready for the
more complicated versioning operations.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On
> Behalf Of Sung Kim
> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 2:52 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [Catacomb] Proposed Road Map
> > >Proposed Mile Stones
> > > - DBMS Abstraction layer
> > > - Discovery of Supported Query Grammars
> > > - DeltaV Core Versinonig package (VERSION-CONTROL. CHECKOUT,
> CHECKIN, UNCHECKOUT, REPORT).
> > > - ACL
> > > - DeltaV Workspace Package (WORKSPACE, VERSION-HISTORY)
> > > - BIND
> > > - DeltaV remains
> > >
> > Not sure if these are in any specific order, but it appears they are.
> > I'd place a higher importance on ACL than Delta-V. The specification is
> > more mature, and much easier to implement. Also, what do you mean by the
> > BIND milestone? How does this relate to Catacomb?
> > Elias
> BIND means "DAV Binding". :-) There are realistic issues about
> the ACL. mod_dav already has DeltaV interface so it is kind of
> easy to implement DeltaV. But mod_dav doesn't have ACL interface
> at this moment, we should write a mod_dav patch first and we need
> Greg's help for the patch. :-)
> Sung Kim
> Catacomb mailing list