RE: [Catacomb] Search Engine
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Yuriy Pasichnyk wrote:
> The candidates for the embedded search engine could be:
> 1. http://www.htdig.org/
> 2. http://swish-e.org/
> 3. http://mnogosearch.org/
> What do you mean with "many issues with indexing" ?
- When can we generate index?
- Where can we put the index?
- The index support multi languages?
- Should we use stemming or dictionary?
I think it is really cool, if we could support the embedded search engine.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sung Kim [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: woensdag 5 maart 2003 19:15
> To: Yuriy Pasichnyk
> Cc: 'firstname.lastname@example.org'
> Subject: Re: [Catacomb] Search Engine
> On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Yuriy Pasichnyk wrote:
> > Dear Sirs,
> > I am working on a project that will use search functionality of Catacomb
> > (DASL) to full extent.
> > But, after looking into details of how Catcomb implemets it I have a
> > question:
> > Wouldn't be better to allow plugging-in real search engines instead
> > of using full-text search capabilities of MySQL ?
> I agree, but which search engine could we use? Also there are many issues in
> > Thanks,
> > Yuriy
> > P.S.
> > The TODO lists among other things the following:
> > - 409 conflict when we get directory
> > - Set right content-type when we PUT
> > Wasn't it already implemented ?
> Yes. This is implemented in CVS development version. The version is not
> released yet.
> Sung Kim