- Project tools
- How do I...
|Over 500 more tools...
Re: [Catacomb] [Ann] Catacomb ODBC
First, thank you both, Ricardo and Gianugo, for your interest in
Catacomb and your valuable contribution to the project!
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
Sung Kim wrote:
[...] Does ODBC affect performance?
Not really, actually it *might* be quite the opposite under some
for a thourough analysis.
Indeed, the performance impact to remote clients is more the effect of
network latency and bandwidth issues than otherwise. In my opinion, the
increased flexibility of ODBC (or similar) more than makes up for any of
the potentially negative impact to performance. However, as noted on the
above link and in the recent emails to the mailing list, performance
does not seem to be an issue. I'm sure that we'll be doing some
benchmarking of our own using the Prestanda suite that has recently been
[...] Oh, besides, if it wasn't clear enough, you're free to take
*anytime* the code and incorporate it in the Catacomb codebase.
Consider this e-mail and Ricardo's one as an official statement of
Adding a ODBC-like layer was an issue that we had discussed previously,
but decided to wait until after a 1.0 release to tackle the problem.
With your contribution, it is highly likely that we will be able to
incorporate it into our 1.0 release!