- Project tools
- How do I...
|Over 500 more tools...
[Catacomb] Moving Catacomb forward
I'd like to start a general discussion on what your preferences are
for the leadership and administration of Catacomb.
It has become increasingly clear to me that we here at UCSC are
unlikely to do much additional development work on Catacomb. None of
my current students have research plans that would have them actively
working on this project.
Despite our being poor stewards of this project, it has still managed
to attract a community of people and businesses around this code. It
seems to me that the best thing for the project is for us to remove
UCSC from the leadership and administrative roles we currently have,
and hand over the reins to others who are more involved and dependent
on this project's success. It would be nice if we still had some
input on future directions, but this should be an advisory role.