Re: [Catacomb] copy_resources and dead properties
This has been clarified in 2518bis to be a SHOULD:
"After a successful COPY invocation, all dead properties on the source
resource SHOULD be duplicated on the destination resource."
I suggest putting it on the trunk.
On 8/9/06, Markus Litz <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
i just discovered that when copying a resource or a collection, no dead
properties of the resources gets copied. Copying of dead properties is
optional in RFC 2518 (section 8.8) - i will develop it in an extra branch.
Anyone against adding it to main trunk if it is finished?
Catacomb mailing list